Anonymous asked: Ok. I will tell you why Robsten moment won't happen. It won't happen for the same reason why she won't get photographed with Rupert. She has absolutely nothing to gain by getting seen with Rob. She may win a point or two from the shippers but for everyone else it will refresh the memories of her cheating. She may want a photo-op or not but Ruth and her team won't let it happen. With the exception of tabloids no one has anything to gain by a photo-op. It is 100% over.
Of course it’s over, that’s not the point. There’s a very good argument that there never was “epic love” in the first place.
OK, here’s why I said it may happen. Part of the odious nature of her betrayal was the effect it had on Pattinson who was - incorrectly, but nonetheless - viewed as her “lover.” Quite a few people found it utterly vile that she’d betray not only Liberty, but her young lover for a creepy old pervert, and in public. And then with the “break-up” if you remember quite a few sites - I have little doubt her people were part of this - tried to paint Pattinson as a “loser” who “couldn’t get over the affair.” But most people didn’t seem to buy it, they could understand a person not being able to trust a cheater, ever again - and it’s true, who can ever trust that asshole? Especially now that she “stands by” her vileness?
My point is, if the opportunity presents itself, I feel that she’d take advantage of it. Rather than avoiding him or backing away, it would help cleanse some of the bad taste left in most people’s mouth after the “break-up” (that is, those who think the relationship was real the whole time). It would look like they were putting their differences aside, and are now on amicable terms. You’re telling me that she / her team would pass on the opportunity to make it look like they’re still “friends” or “friendly” rather than the last memories of their (fake) relationship being her in (crocodile) tears and a stern-looking Pattinson packing his shit? I have to respectfully disagree with you here, I think she’d jump at the opportunity to mislead people into thinking that the two are still on friendly terms.
And if she doesn’t want us remembering the betrayal, maybe she shouldn’t have brought it up - and seem proud of it - in Marie Claire just two or so months ago.
As for being photographed with Ruptert…of course she won’t! First, that would obviously dredge up the betrayal and make it fresh and open - we’re not talking Pattinson here, we’re talking the old prick she destroyed a family with! Second, remember when in all likelihood she DID hook up with him after his divorce? That was a mini-shitstorm in its own right whether it WAS him or not. And third, contrary to her lying mouth, it would appear that he cut off contact with her, though I wouldn’t put it past those two dickheads to hook up again in private - him because he’s a sick bastard, her because she might smell an opportunity.
BTW, I do not think a would-be Cannes meeting has anything to do with the shippers or robsten - though of course they’ll go nuts with the “proof”, but remember they go nuts when she wears a fucking hat. It doesn’t take much to stir them up, if she wears a sweatshirt they think she’s pregnant for fuck’s sake!
And that more or less closes this subject, until the festival, when we will see. Anything more - pro or con - is just speculation.
Trust me, I hope that YOU are right. Though it would still mean nothing - except yet more confirmation that she is a voracious fame-whore, something we already know - it would be powerfully annoying.
Anonymous asked: There are a lot of Cannes movies that don't have a trailer yet. Winter's Sleep is the Palme d'Or favorite and it still has no trailer. Naomi Kawase's Still The Water and Alice Rohrwacher's movie don't have trailers either. It is pretty common for producers to release trailers closer to the competition in order to build the buzz at the right time. Secondly, why is everyone so fixated on Robsten photo-op ? Both of them have moved on and it isn't going to happen.
OK, but here’s the most important part: trailer or not, award or not, failure or success, Sils Maria, like OTR, is not Stewart’s movie. It’s Binoche’s. Stewart is an accessory, and if not for name recognition (among other possible reasons - who knows for sure? Who can trust her? Certainly not directors’ wives) she could easily be replaced with a better and more deserving actor.
As for a “robsten” photo-op, it won’t be for “robsten” and I never claimed that it would be for that reason. If it happens it will be a sheer PR move by the famewhore, not intended to be interpreted as her being his girlfriend, but rather - as I wrote way too many times - as a “no hard feelings” moment to help repair her image. That’s all, and it may not even happen (I hope not), but could you seriously put it past her? She, who used the Jeep (with her leech “friend” driving) for a fake “robsten” moment when she needed PR and had NO offers? She who poses for paps (isn’t papping like rape???) and may even call them - at the very least she lets them know where she’ll be when she wants cheap PR. She who was name-dropping, that is, almost begging for advertising contracts in her recent interviews (a shameless ploy noticed by gossip sites like Celebitchy, et al) ?
it’s typical for her fans to claim any movie that she appears in to be hers, and if Sils wins (based on other actors’ performances) they’ll claim it was because of her, rather than the reality - it will be in spite of her lifeless, one-note performance.
Anonymous asked: Hi Hayden. Of the 19 films in competition at Cannes, the only one that has no tráiler, is SM. Nobody talks about the role of KS in SM, and the only actress that critics are talking after Binoche, is Chloe Moretz.. CXR never had trailer. K will go unnoticed in Cannes, if she doesn't do PR at the expense of Rob. Unfortunately
…or make an ass out of herself again. My gut feeling is that she’ll try a photo op with Pattinson - “no hard feelings” LOL when she’s the asshole who made him look bad - but reason tells me that I’m wrong, that he and people whose advice he seeks are on top of that shit, and he won’t let her make him look like a loser or doormat or servant ever again. When she got away with that vile shit (more vileness, that seems to be swept under the rug…she had no problem making Pattinson “her lover” look weak and pathetic, and never once came out with a REAL apology) but at the time they were under contract over Twilight and he couldn’t tell her to fuck off; that’s over now, thank God.
I certainly hope the opportunity never comes up, but even if it does it means nothing except that Pattinson can behave in a reserved and dignified manner, and that she is a shameless attention whore desperate for PR. We already know both of those things. Aside from sickening such an encounter will mean nothing.
X-Ray isn’t even at Cannes, so they can talk shit all they want, it’s just noise (as usual) and Sils is NOT the betrayer’s film. And you are right, even the synopsis on the Guardian site dealing with Cannes discusses Binoche and Moretz without even a mention of Rupert’s blow-up doll.
The Krisbian idiots (I repeat myself) are spamming the tweets on some sites about Stewart and Sils, no mention of the actual stars, again it’s the MO of her team and her fans, lie enough times and it becomes “truth”.
Thanks for the note :)